October 21, 2026

If I were running a venture-backed tech startup and wanted to make the military a meaningful customer, I wouldn’t approach FY27 by chasing every funding opportunity available.
I’d build a roadmap.
The goal isn’t to win one SBIR award. It’s to use early awards to create a path toward larger transition funding, program office adoption, and eventually recurring defense revenue.
Here’s how I’d approach FY27.
If you're still early in your defense journey, SBIR and STTR can be valuable entry points.
Rather than submitting to everything that looks remotely relevant, I’d focus on roughly five to seven highly targeted opportunities that:
The objective isn't collecting Phase I awards.
It's creating a path to Phase II and beyond.
If you're already eligible for Direct-to-Phase-II opportunities, that's another path worth evaluating.
If you're already at Phase II going into FY27, your strategy should evolve.
Now you need to identify the organizations that could eventually buy and scale your technology.
Start building relationships with program offices, acquisition organizations, requirements owners, and operational end users.
Don't wait until your Phase II is almost over.
Use the effort to validate the technology, gather feedback, work through integration and cybersecurity requirements, and understand what it will take for the program office to eventually put real acquisition dollars behind the capability.
The question you need to answer is:
Who buys this when the innovation funding stops?
Once you've proven the technology and developed government champions, start looking at the next layer of funding.
Depending on your Service, technology, and eligibility, that could include programs such as TACFI, STRATFI, APFIT, or other transition and scaling opportunities.
But here's the important part:
Don't start building the customer relationship when the funding opportunity drops.
You want the government customer already engaged, providing feedback, and thinking about how your technology fits into their longer-term requirements.
For venture-backed companies, fundraising and federal strategy shouldn't operate in two separate worlds.
If you're raising another $5 million, $10 million, or $20 million privately, ask what additional government opportunities that investment could help unlock.
Ideally, you're combining:
Private capital + government funding + a successful technology demonstration + program office support.
That creates a much stronger transition story than simply moving from one pilot to another.
By FY28 and beyond, the goal should be moving away from innovation funding and toward real acquisition revenue.
That means the conversations you have in FY27 need to include future budgets, contracting pathways, Phase III opportunities, cybersecurity, integration requirements, and how the government could eventually buy your technology at scale.
Government budgets don't move at startup speed.
The earlier you start those conversations, the better.
For a venture-backed commercial technology company, the simplified journey looks something like:
FY27: SBIR/STTR → Phase II → program office relationships
FY28: Transition funding → TACFI/STRATFI/APFIT or other scaling pathways
FY29+: Phase III → acquisition → recurring defense revenue
The exact programs and timing will look different for every company.
But the mindset should stay the same.
Don't ask:
"What can we win in FY27?"
Ask:
"What can we do in FY27 that gets us closer to a scalable defense customer?"
That's the difference between winning government funding and building a defense business.